CCC discusses security, part 2: it's good in theory
- Steve Jobs: Does anyone have any other ideas on potential security tools?
- Steve Jobs: @Fisher price, do you think this is a good idea?
- Skepticism: have you asked staff about this?
- Steve Jobs: No.
- Fisher price: The thing about the image security tool is that you could design a script to scan the image and return something like safe/unsafe, but somebody could also modify it to return ALL data from the image, including source, server, etc. which could possibly lead to another export
- Steve Jobs: It would be a userscript.
- Fisher price: Exploit**
- Steve Jobs: No staff permission needed, aside from edit evaluations.
- Fisher price: I think it's good in theory, but some logistics still need straightening out
- Steve Jobs: yay
- Skepticism: so would that be restricted in use to admins or anyone?
- Steve Jobs: anyone who is not staff.
- Skepticism: you won't let staff use it?
- Steve Jobs: Staff would be restricted, but that's a licensing issue.
- Steve Jobs: VirusTotal has restrictions on commercial use.
- Steve Jobs: But regular users would be fine.
- Fisher price: How would you prevent anybody from getting any info besides safe/unsafe?
- Steve Jobs: We'd be relying on the security of the MediaWiki system.
- Steve Jobs: Which is admittedly crap.